Skip to main content

NCTC : An Analysis

Basics: 
CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) is the intelligence agency of USA meant for combatting external threat.
FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) is the one which is responsible for combating internal threat.

MI5 (Military intelligence 5) works for UK the same way the CIA works.
MI6 works the way FBI works.

IB (Intelligence Bureau) is India's intelligence agency which keeps and eye on internal threat.
RAW (Research and Analysis Wing) is India's intelligency agency taking care of external threat.
CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) is the criminal investigation body of India.
NIA (National Intelligence Agency) is a federal agency to combat terror in India.

Story goes like this:
Before 9/11 United States CIA had Counter Terrorism Center (CTC) for terrorist threat. It was actually meant for external threat.

On the same ground, Bajpayee Govt. formed CTC under an executive order as a part of IB and named it Multi Agency Center (MAC). As IB itself was a clandestine body and MAC was a clandestine part of it, it possessed no leagal power.

After 9/11 Bush Govt. set up NCTC (National Counter-Terrorism Center) in 2004 as there was a serious gap in the functioning of CIA and CTC. NCTC was not put under CIA and was made independent under the Director, National Intelligence who is part of President's personal staff.

While US gave up CTC, it kept functioning in India under IB. Saxena Task Force, which was set up to analyse the impact of 9/11 gave recommendation but it was not taken into notice by any Govt.

The Govt. woke up after similar attack as 9/11 took place in 26/11. The gap in functioning in MAC came into light. Flow of preventive intelligence and follow-up action on even the limited available intelligence was unsatisfactory.

In its wake, Home Minister P. Chidamabaram decided to setup NCTC after a visit to US. But his model of Indian NCTC is different from US version in two respects. The US NCTC is an independent institution not under control of any existing agency. In India it will be made a wing of IB and will work under DIB.

In US, NCTC is a legal institution but it does not have any legal power to act on its own in matter such as arrest, detention, interrogation, searches etc.

In India, NCTC has been set up under executive notification under UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act) of 1967. This has obviated the need for fresh legislation and fresh political consultation at the Center and with the States.

More seriously, Indian NCTC is to be given powers of arrests and searches as part of its preventive powers. Granting these powers to NCTC could have two undesirable consequences. First there may be allegations of misuse of the IB for harassing political opponents.

Secondly, the IB's role as cladenstine intelligence collection organisation may get affected. The IB will be preoccupied with defending its arrest before the courts and against allegations of human rights violations.

Today, the IB enjoys protection from the RTI Act. If it has these powers and adds policing to its functions, it may no longer be able to enjoy this protection.

The Home Ministry had two options:
  1. If it felt the NCTC must have the powers of search and arrest, it could have made it an independent agency.
  2. If it felt that it must work under the IB, it could have made it a division of the agency without giving it these powers.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Copenhagen Summit

Background The negotiating process on climate change revolves around the sessions of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP), which meets every year to review the implementation of the Convention. This year this process culminates in Copenhagen. At Bali, Parties agreed to jointly step up international efforts to combat climate change and get to an agreed outcome in Copenhagen in 2009. Thus, an ambitious climate change deal will be clinched to follow on the first phase of the UN’s Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012. Why is a deal so important? We know the world is warming, on average by 0.74ºC during the past century, with most of that since 1970. The IPCC has reported regularly on climate change science for 20 years. Its last report was “unequivocal” that climate change is with us, and is set to get drastically worse unless we take urgent action. Nature, through both oceans and forests, currently absorbs ab
Post a Comment
Read more

First Amendment Act, 1951

Empowered the state to make special provision for advancement of socially and economically backward classes Provided for the saving of laws providing for acquisition of the State, etc. Added ninth schedule to protect the land reform and other laws included in it and judicial review Added three more ground of restrictions on freedom of speech and expression viz., public order, friendly relations with foreign states and incitement to an offence. Also made the restriction reasonable and justiciable in nature Provided that state trading and nationalization of any trade or business by state is not to be invalid on the ground of violation of the right to trade or business
Post a Comment
Read more

Single Transferable Vote System (The Hare System)

This is a voting system which is designed to achieve proportional representation thorough preferential voting. Under STV, an elector’s vote is initially allocated to his/her most preferred candidate, and then after the candidate is either elected or eliminated, any surplus or unused vote are transferred to according to voter’s stated preference. The system minimizes “wasted” votes, provides approximately proportional representation, and enables votes to be explicitly cast for individual candidates rather than for closed party lists. It achieves this by using multi-seat constituencies (voting district) and by transferring votes to other eligible candidates that would otherwise wasted on sure losers and sure winners. Voting: In STV each voter ranks the list of candidates in order of preference. In other words, the voter places a “1” beside their most preferred candidate, a “2” beside their second preferred candidate, and so on. The ballot paper submitted by the voters therefore c
Post a Comment
Read more