Skip to main content

Single Transferable Vote System (The Hare System)

This is a voting system which is designed to achieve proportional representation thorough preferential voting. Under STV, an elector’s vote is initially allocated to his/her most preferred candidate, and then after the candidate is either elected or eliminated, any surplus or unused vote are transferred to according to voter’s stated preference. The system minimizes “wasted” votes, provides approximately proportional representation, and enables votes to be explicitly cast for individual candidates rather than for closed party lists. It achieves this by using multi-seat constituencies (voting district) and by transferring votes to other eligible candidates that would otherwise wasted on sure losers and sure winners.

Voting:
In STV each voter ranks the list of candidates in order of preference. In other words, the voter places a “1” beside their most preferred candidate, a “2” beside their second preferred candidate, and so on. The ballot paper submitted by the voters therefore contains an ordinal list of candidates.
Counting of Votes:

Setting the Quota
In an STV election, a candidate requires a certain minimum number of votes – the Quota (or threshold) – to be elected. A number of different quotas can be used; the most common is the Droop quota, given by the formula:


Where the quota is an integer. When the quota is not an integer, the fractional part is rounded off. The Droop quota is an extension of requiring 50% + 1 majority in single winner election. This 50% + 1 quota is used in the election of Presidential election in India.
As per Droop quota, at most 3 people can have 25% + 1 in a 3 winner elections, 9 can have 10% + 1 in 9 winner elections, and so on.

Finding the Winner:
An STV election proceeds according to the following steps:
  1. Any candidate who has reached or exceeded the quota is declared elected.
  2. If a candidate has more votes than the quota, that candidate’s surplus votes are transferred to other candidates.  Votes that would have gone to the winner go instead to the next preferred candidates.
  3. If no one new meets the quota, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and that candidate votes are transferred. This process repeats until a winner is found for every seat or there are as many seats as remaining candidates.

Example:
Suppose in a fictitious election, there are six candidates A, B, C, D, E and F. Total valid votes cast are 100. Total seats are 3.
Total number of candidates = 6
Total number of valid votes = 100
Total Seats = 3
Quota (Threshold) = (100 / (3 + 1)) + 1 = 26


Following is the list of votes gained by candidate and preference.
No of Votes / Preference
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1st
A
A
B
A
C
E
B
F
A
F
2nd
B
C
D
B
D
F
D
C
F

3rd


A
C


C
B


4th



D


A




As First Preference,
A’s Votes = 40
B’s Votes = 20
C’s Votes = 10
D’s Votes = 0
E’s Votes = 10
F’s Votes = 20

So A exceeds the quota. Hence he is elected.
Except A no one could reach the quota.
Surplus votes of A = 40 – 26 = 14
Second preference of A with their ratio are B : C : F ≡ 20 : 10 : 10
Hence, votes to be divided are
B’s share = 14/2 = 7
C’s share = 14/4 = 3 (.5 rounded off)
F’s share = 14/4 = 3 (.5 rounded off)

Now votes by candidate are
B’s Votes = 20 + 7 = 27
C’s Votes = 10 + 3 = 13
D’s Votes = 0
E’s Votes = 10
F’s Votes = 20 + 3 = 23

So B reaches the Threshold, so elected.
B’s excess vote = 27 – 26 = 1
B’s next preferences are C and D.
C : D ≡ 10 : 20
So votes division is 1/3 for C and 2/3 for D.
That is C’s share = 0 (After rounding off .33 votes)
And D’s share = 1 (After rounding .66 votes)

Now votes by candidate are
C’s Votes = 13 + 0 = 13
D’s Votes = 0 + 1 = 1
E’s Votes = 10
F’s Votes = 23

Now no one reaches the threshold. So the candidate with the least votes shall be eliminated.
Candidate with least votes is D.
Next preference of D are A and C. A has already been elected, so D’s vote shall go to C.

Now votes by candidate are
C’s Votes = 13 + 1 = 14
E’s Votes = 10
F’s Votes = 23

Now again, no one qualifies. So candidate with least votes shall be eliminated. Hence E is eliminated. E’s second preference is F. so his votes shall go to F.

Now votes by candidate are
C’s Votes = 13 + 1 = 14
F’s Votes = 23 + 10 = 33

Now F qualifies by exceeding the quota. Hence he is elected.


So the elected candidates are A, B and F.

Courtesy: wikipedia
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The legacy of Srinivasa Ramanujan

His work has had a fundamental role in the development of 20th century mathematics and his final writings are serving as an inspiration for the mathematics of this century On a height he stood that looked towards greater heights. Our early approaches to the Infinite Are sunrise splendours on a marvellous verge While lingers yet unseen the glorious sun. What now we see is a shadow of what must come. Sri Aurobindo, Savitri, 1.4 The story of Srinivasa Ramanujan is a 20th century “rags to mathematical riches” story. In his short life, Ramanujan had a wealth of ideas that have transformed and reshaped 20th century mathematics. These ideas continue to shape mathematics of the 21st century. This article seeks to give a panoramic view of his essential contributions. Born on December 22, 1887 in the town of Erode in Tamil Nadu, Ramanujan was largely self-taught and emerged from extreme poverty to become one of the most influential mathematicians of the 20th c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Landmarks in the Constitutional Development of India

Regulating Act, 1773 It was the first attempt by the British Parliament to regulate the affairs of the East India Company Governor of Bengal became Governor General for all British territories in India Governor General had a Council of 4 members to assist him in administration Bombay and Madras Presidencies were subordinated to Bengal Presidency Supreme Court was set up at Calcutta having jurisdiction over British subjects Amending Act, 1781 Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court was defined Governor-General-in-Council was made the final court of appeal from provincial court. Pitt's India Act, 1784 East India Company's Court of Directors (consisting of 24 members) was left with the responsibilities of only commercial affairs of the company Board of Control consisting of 6 Parliamentary Commissioners was constituted to control civil, military and revenue affairs of East India Company in India. Court of Directors had to comply with the orders and directio...
Post a Comment
Read more

India signs international tax treaty

Date : January 30, 2012 In yet another move to get information about black money stashed away abroad, India has signed the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, a multilateral agreement that promotes international cooperation while respecting the rights of taxpayers. This will send a strong signal that India and the other 31 signatory countries have joined hands to ensure that individuals and multinational enterprises pay the right amount of tax, at the right time and in the right place. The Convention provides for administrative cooperation among the parties in the assessment and collection of taxes, with a view to combating tax avoidance and evasion, according to a statement by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) here. With taxpayers increasingly operating on a global basis, tax authorities are moving from bilateral to multilateral cooperation and from exchange of information on request to other forms of co...
Post a Comment
Read more