Skip to main content

Charter Act of 1793

By 1793, when the company's charter timed out the British parliament passed a new charter which authorized the company to carry on trade with the East Indies for next 20 years.
  • The company was allowed to increase its dividend to 10%.

The Act recognized the Company's political functions and clearly established that the "acquisition of sovereignty by the subjects of the Crown is on behalf of the Crown and not in its own right."
  • A provision in the Charter act of 1793 was made that the company, after paying the necessary expenses, interest, dividend, salaries, etc from the Indian Revenues will pay 5 Lakh British pounds annually out of the surplus revenue to the British Government. However, the act also had a provision, that Crown could order the application of the whole of the revenue for the purpose of defense if the circumstances posed such demands.
  • Expenses, interest, dividend, salaries, etc were to be borne by the Indian Exchequer.

In this act the Governor General was empowered to disregard the majority in the Council in special circumstances. Thus more powers were entrusted in him. The Governor General and respective governors of the other presidencies could now override the respective councils, and the commander in chief was not now the member of Governor General's council, unless he was specially appointed to be a member by the Court of Directors.
  • If a high official departed from India without permission, it was to be treated as resignation.

This act reorganized the courts and defined their jurisdictions. The revenue administration was divorced from the judiciary funtions and this led to disappearinf of the Maal Adalats.
The Charter Act of 1773 was followed by the Act of 1797 which reduced the number or Judges of the Superme court at Calcutta from 4 to 3 (One chief Justice and 2 other judges).
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Copenhagen Summit

Background The negotiating process on climate change revolves around the sessions of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP), which meets every year to review the implementation of the Convention. This year this process culminates in Copenhagen. At Bali, Parties agreed to jointly step up international efforts to combat climate change and get to an agreed outcome in Copenhagen in 2009. Thus, an ambitious climate change deal will be clinched to follow on the first phase of the UN’s Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012. Why is a deal so important? We know the world is warming, on average by 0.74ºC during the past century, with most of that since 1970. The IPCC has reported regularly on climate change science for 20 years. Its last report was “unequivocal” that climate change is with us, and is set to get drastically worse unless we take urgent action. Nature, through both oceans and forests, currently absorbs ab
Post a Comment
Read more

First Amendment Act, 1951

Empowered the state to make special provision for advancement of socially and economically backward classes Provided for the saving of laws providing for acquisition of the State, etc. Added ninth schedule to protect the land reform and other laws included in it and judicial review Added three more ground of restrictions on freedom of speech and expression viz., public order, friendly relations with foreign states and incitement to an offence. Also made the restriction reasonable and justiciable in nature Provided that state trading and nationalization of any trade or business by state is not to be invalid on the ground of violation of the right to trade or business
Post a Comment
Read more

Single Transferable Vote System (The Hare System)

This is a voting system which is designed to achieve proportional representation thorough preferential voting. Under STV, an elector’s vote is initially allocated to his/her most preferred candidate, and then after the candidate is either elected or eliminated, any surplus or unused vote are transferred to according to voter’s stated preference. The system minimizes “wasted” votes, provides approximately proportional representation, and enables votes to be explicitly cast for individual candidates rather than for closed party lists. It achieves this by using multi-seat constituencies (voting district) and by transferring votes to other eligible candidates that would otherwise wasted on sure losers and sure winners. Voting: In STV each voter ranks the list of candidates in order of preference. In other words, the voter places a “1” beside their most preferred candidate, a “2” beside their second preferred candidate, and so on. The ballot paper submitted by the voters therefore c
Post a Comment
Read more