Skip to main content

Context of Aadhaar

At present, the central and state governments in India issue different identity for specific purposes. These documents may be issued to individuals (passport, Election Card, PAN card, driving license), or to households (ration card, Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojna card).

In April 2000, a Group of Ministers was set to review the national security system and to consider recommendations of Kargil Review Committee. The report on "Reforming the National Security System", submitted in 2001, recommended that a multi-purpose National Identity Card (MNIC) should be issued, starting from the border districts. The purpose was to prepare a National Register of Indian Citizens. 

In 2003, the Citizenship Act, 1955 was amended to allow the central government to compulsorily register every citizen and issue them with identity cards. 
In March 2006, another project called "Unique ID for Below Poverty Line families" was approved by the Department of Information Technology. 

It was decided to merge the two schemes for which an Empowered Group of Ministers (chaired by Mr. Pranab Mukherjee) was set up in December 2006. In November 2008, the EGoM approved certain decisions:

  • initially the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) would be notified as an executive authority (statutory authority to be constituted later);
  • an initial database would be created from electoral rolls;
  • UIDAI would take its own decision on how to build the database; and
  • it wouldbe anchored in the Planning Commission for five years. The UIDAI was notified by the Planning Commission on January 28, 2009 and Mr. Nandan Nilekani was appointed as the Chairman.
The Bill seeks to establish the National Identification Authority (earlier UIDAI) as statutory authority and to specify its functions. It also entitles every resident of India to obtain a unique identification number.

Courtesy: PRS India
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Copenhagen Summit

Background The negotiating process on climate change revolves around the sessions of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP), which meets every year to review the implementation of the Convention. This year this process culminates in Copenhagen. At Bali, Parties agreed to jointly step up international efforts to combat climate change and get to an agreed outcome in Copenhagen in 2009. Thus, an ambitious climate change deal will be clinched to follow on the first phase of the UN’s Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012. Why is a deal so important? We know the world is warming, on average by 0.74ºC during the past century, with most of that since 1970. The IPCC has reported regularly on climate change science for 20 years. Its last report was “unequivocal” that climate change is with us, and is set to get drastically worse unless we take urgent action. Nature, through both oceans and forests, currently absorbs ab
Post a Comment
Read more

First Amendment Act, 1951

Empowered the state to make special provision for advancement of socially and economically backward classes Provided for the saving of laws providing for acquisition of the State, etc. Added ninth schedule to protect the land reform and other laws included in it and judicial review Added three more ground of restrictions on freedom of speech and expression viz., public order, friendly relations with foreign states and incitement to an offence. Also made the restriction reasonable and justiciable in nature Provided that state trading and nationalization of any trade or business by state is not to be invalid on the ground of violation of the right to trade or business
Post a Comment
Read more

Single Transferable Vote System (The Hare System)

This is a voting system which is designed to achieve proportional representation thorough preferential voting. Under STV, an elector’s vote is initially allocated to his/her most preferred candidate, and then after the candidate is either elected or eliminated, any surplus or unused vote are transferred to according to voter’s stated preference. The system minimizes “wasted” votes, provides approximately proportional representation, and enables votes to be explicitly cast for individual candidates rather than for closed party lists. It achieves this by using multi-seat constituencies (voting district) and by transferring votes to other eligible candidates that would otherwise wasted on sure losers and sure winners. Voting: In STV each voter ranks the list of candidates in order of preference. In other words, the voter places a “1” beside their most preferred candidate, a “2” beside their second preferred candidate, and so on. The ballot paper submitted by the voters therefore c
Post a Comment
Read more